<?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8' ?>
<!--  If you are running a bot please visit this policy page outlining rules you must respect. http://www.insanejournal.com/bots/  -->
<rss version='2.0' xmlns:lj='http://www.livejournal.org/rss/lj/1.0/'>
<channel>
  <title>Clare-Dragonfly</title>
  <link>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/</link>
  <description>Clare-Dragonfly - InsaneJournal</description>
  <managingEditor>gwraig.annwn@gmail.com</managingEditor>
  <lastBuildDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:50:42 GMT</lastBuildDate>
  <generator>LiveJournal / InsaneJournal</generator>
  

<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/14005.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 18:50:42 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Go take a poll!</title>
  <author>gwraig.annwn@gmail.com</author>  <link>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/14005.html</link>
  <description>I know I&apos;ve got some fannish friends here, so I shall &lt;a href=&quot;http://beckaandzac.livejournal.com/266932.html&quot;&gt;pimp Becka&apos;s poll&lt;/a&gt;! It&apos;s about being aware of canon when reading/writing fanfic.</description>
  <comments>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/14005.html</comments>
  <category>fandom</category>
  <category>security: public</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/2055.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 23:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Taste</title>
  <author>gwraig.annwn@gmail.com</author>  <link>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/2055.html</link>
  <description>I am SO SICK of people calling the art that got Ponderosa and Elaboration originally suspended &quot;tasteless.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Look, taste doesn&apos;t even enter into the equation! Obviously it was to &lt;i&gt;some&lt;/i&gt; people&apos;s taste, as people did decide to view it. But that&apos;s just the point--the pictures were clearly labeled and under a cut. (Ponderosa has said hers was, and I assume Elaboration&apos;s was, because that&apos;s just what&apos;s &lt;i&gt;done&lt;/i&gt; in the HP fandom.) If you wanted to view it, you knew what you were getting into. Taste is just not relevant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, I do think that posting pornographic images (and especially cat macros) in comments to news and lj_biz posts was in poor taste. But that&apos;s an entirely different situation. That&apos;s posting with intent to annoy, in places where people are not expecting to come upon porn (at least at first).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tastelessness depends on context. If someone says &quot;A woman&apos;s place is in the kitchen,&quot; that&apos;s absolutely tasteless if said in the presence of anyone--male or female--who would be offended by it. (I would hope that would be most people, but that&apos;s not relevant.) However, if it is said only in the presence of similarly misogynistic people, then there isn&apos;t a question of taste.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides, I still haven&apos;t seen Elaboration&apos;s picture, but there&apos;s no question in my mind that Ponderosa&apos;s has significant artistic merit--meaning there aren&apos;t very many places where it would, in fact, be tasteless.</description>
  <comments>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/2055.html</comments>
  <category>fandom</category>
  <category>lj</category>
  <category>security: public</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/1395.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 02:41:19 GMT</pubDate>
  <title>Sex=good... maybe</title>
  <author>gwraig.annwn@gmail.com</author>  <link>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/1395.html</link>
  <description>Here are two posts that I think are really interesting and important, despite the fact that they don&apos;t refer to fandoms I have more than passing familiarity with:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://purplefeen.insanejournal.com/21835.html&quot;&gt;Sex is not a dirty word--or a dirty act&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://rivkat.livejournal.com/165410.html&quot;&gt;Sexualizing of teen characters&lt;/a&gt;</description>
  <comments>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/1395.html</comments>
  <category>sex</category>
  <category>fandom</category>
  <category>security: public</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
</item>
<item>
  <guid isPermaLink='true'>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/404.html</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 23:56:07 GMT</pubDate>
  <author>gwraig.annwn@gmail.com</author>  <link>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/404.html</link>
  <description>I&apos;m sure everyone has already heard about burr86&apos;s public mocking of fandom, but for those who haven&apos;t seen it, I&apos;d like to direct you to &lt;a href=&quot;http://firefox.org/news/articles/555/1/Livejournal-Employee-Publicly-Mocks-Fandom/Page1.html&quot;&gt;this post in Firefox News&lt;/a&gt; regarding it. The poster has clearly described exactly the same points I think need to be made as regards what LJ should and should not be doing.</description>
  <comments>http://clare-dragonfly.insanejournal.com/404.html</comments>
  <category>fandom</category>
  <category>lj</category>
  <category>security: public</category>
  <lj:security>public</lj:security>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
